What needs to be done is to create a new line of defense for Roe, in case Roberts spontaneously developes an opinion on whether privacy extends to abortion rights. In addition to the privacy aspect, we should argue for it using women's rights/gender equality (men are never required to share their bodies with another life-form), bodily autonomy (a fetus has no right to an unwilling host body, the state has no authority to force women to work toward any compelling interest in sustaining life, comparison with blood, organ, and tissue donations), and under first amendment grounds, the religious nature of many arguments against abortion (conservative Christians forcing, say, an atheist, to carry a pregnancy to term is illegally forcing her to live by the rules of their religion, with the help of the government).

I'd like to see someone mount a legal challenge to parental consent laws, from a bodily-autonomy standpoint, and also it'd be wonderful if someone challenged the parental notification laws on the basis that they're an invasion of privacy and of doctor-patient confidentiality. Not likely, of course, but it would be nice.